Reliability and validity of the bible
For one thing, they were mostly Jewish theists. The Speeches in Acts 1—12 The evangelistic speeches in Acts 1—12 bear special mentions.
Defending the validity of the bible
It sounds like we are using the testimony of the Bible to prove that the Bible is true. Most scholars date it from three to eight years after Jesus' death. Ancient historians were not as critical or precise as their modern counterparts. In this hypothesis, the events of, for example, Exodus would have happened centuries before they were finally edited. Indeed, it would be impossible to conceive of the Bible as divinely inspired and yet untruthful at the same time, for God is utterly truthful Titus ; Heb. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, —76 , —40; Michael Green, ed. Manson has said it well: The Pauline letters abound in utterances which could easily be transferred to Jesus and presented to the world as oracles of the Lord. The Gospels and Jewish Oral Tradition Over the last several years, trends in New Testament studies have been toward understanding the Gospels as Jewish documents with a Jewish influence shaping them. But this feature was widespread in the ancient world and is the most likely parallel to hold between Jesus and the rabbis.
This may appear to be circular reasoning. This is especially true in light of the embarrassment of the crucifixion. Moreland is an American philosopher, theologian, and apologist. Howard Marshall Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,pp. These forms are largely confined to the sayings in the tradition, as opposed to the narratives.
Here are some good reasons to believe we possess an accurate OT text. Martitz, in Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, ed.
It seems likely, therefore, that this formula was given to Paul at the meeting which took place three to four years after the crucifixion. For example, after several years Jesus' return seemed to be delayed, and believers began to die.
Some of these features are made more vivid when placed against the backdrop of a form- and redaction-critical approach. It is a false dichotomy to say something has to be either history or a document which promotes a message.
Here are some recommended resources:.
based on 114 review